CIRCLE (The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement)
conducts research on the civic and political engagement of young Americans.
The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement

Reforming Civic Education: Three Case Studies

March 17th, 2014
Tweet
Share
Email to a Friend

According to research summarized in our 2013 report “All Together Now: Collaboration and Innovation for Youth Engagement,” young people who take a well-designed and well-taught high school civics course—one that encourages thoughtful discussion and the development of civic skills—are more knowledgeable and more likely to engage as citizens in the future.

Unfortunately, civic education in the U.S. still leaves much to be desired. In the last few years, several states have taken up civic education policy reforms. These reforms exemplify diverse approaches to improving civics instruction and the challenges faced by state officials in passing and implementing effective reforms.

Recently, CIRCLE did case studies of three such states:

  • In Florida, the Justice Sandra Day O’Connor Civics Education Act passed in 2010, mandating a high-stakes standardized test in civics.
  • In Hawaii, a required “Participation in Democracy” course places a strong emphasis on experiential education: the requirement was passed in 2006 and an effort to repeal it was defeated.
  • In Tennessee, recent legislation mandates project-based civics assessments at the middle and high school levels.

Today, we release a short fact sheet that describes each bill or proposal in detail, including the advantages and drawbacks identified by both proponents and detractors. We also release a longer paper that includes interviews with prominent stakeholders in each state and takes an initial look at the process behind each proposal and some of the issues faced by the educators tasked with implementing them. Both products were made possible through the support of the S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation.

While Florida, Tennessee, and Hawaii are using different approaches to try to improve civic education, there are important commonalities that advocates and policymakers in other states would be wise to consider. In all three cases—though to varying degrees—the combination of grassroots activism and high-level support from current or former legislators was key to achieving the desired outcome. All three states are also now tackling implementation challenges such as a lack of funding, scarce professional development, and weak communication between state and local authorities.

Read the fact sheet, which describes each state’s civic education policy.

Read the paper, which details the process behind each state’s reforms.

For those interested in what the 50 states require, see our 2012-13 scan of state civic education policy. It shows which of the 40 states require at least one course in American government or civics, which nine states require students to pass a social studies test in order to graduate from high school, and which eight states have statewide, standardized tests specifically in civics/American government (We will be releasing an update to the policy scan soon in the form of an interactive map).

Find more analysis in our 2016 Election Center. For regular updates in your Inbox about youth and the 2016 election, sign up for CIRCLE's monthly E-Update here.

One Response to “Reforming Civic Education: Three Case Studies”

  1. three paths to civic education reform « Peter Levine Says:

    […] civic education reform Posted on March 17, 2014 by Peter Today, CIRCLE releases case studies of three significant state-level reforms for civic education. We chose them because they reflect very different approaches to improving […]